|
Environmental
Indicators
|
| |
|
|
|
Sulphur
Oxides
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen
Oxides
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatile
Organic Compounds
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon
Monoxide
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenhouse
Gas
Emissions
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water
Consumption
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Sewage Treatment
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Consumption
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Efficiency
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
Waste
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recycling
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hazardous
Waste
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear
Waste
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ozone
Depletion
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pesticide
Use
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fertilizer
Use
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Livestock
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Species
at Risk
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protected
Areas
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fisheries
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forests
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Road
Vehicles
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distance
Traveled
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Population
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Official
Development Assistance
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
study compares Canadas environmental record to the other industrialized
nations in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) and tracks Canadas progress (or lack thereof) on environmental
issues over the past two decades. Twenty-five environmental indicators
in ten categories air, water, energy, biodiversity, waste,
climate change, ozone depletion, agriculture, transportation and miscellaneous
are examined.
The
study provides accurate, independent information about Canadas
track record in protecting the environment. All of the statistical
information comes from data verified and published by the OECD.
The
results prove that Canada has one
of the poorest environmental records of the industrialized countries.
The primary finding is that for the twenty-five environmental indicators
examined, Canadas overall ranking among OECD nations is a
dismal 28th out of 29.
Other
major findings of the study are:
|
|
Canada
is among the three best countries on zero indicators; |
| |
|
|
|
Canada is among the three worst countries on nine indicators
(per capita greenhouse gas emissions, sulphur dioxide emissions,
carbon monoxide emissions, volatile organic compound emissions,
water consumption, energy consumption, energy efficiency, volume
of timber logged and generation of nuclear waste); |
| |
|
|
|
Canadas
economy is inefficient, in that we use much more energy and
generate much more pollution to produce a given amount of goods
and services relative to our industrial competitors, including
33% more energy than the United States per unit of GDP; and |
| |
|
|
|
Canadas
performance on most environmental indicators continues to worsen,
including: increasing water consumption, increasing energy consumption,
increases in nuclear and hazardous waste, higher greenhouse
gas emissions, higher numbers of endangered species, declining
fish populations, higher commercial fertilizer use, more livestock,
more timber logged, more motor vehicles, more kilometres traveled
by road, higher population and lower official development assistance. |
On the
other hand, it is important to note that there are several positive
findings provided by this study:
|
|
Canadas
performance is improving on ten indicators, including reduced
air pollution (lower per capita emissions of sulphur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds),
improved sewage treatment, reduced municipal waste, increased
recycling, improved energy efficiency, decreased production
of ozone-depleting substances and an increase in parks and protected
areas; and |
| |
|
|
|
The
superior progress by other industrialized nations, particularly
the northern European countries, demonstrates that there are
practical, effective solutions to the environmental problems
facing Canada. |
Air Pollution
Canada has made progress in reducing air pollution. Emissions of
sulphur dioxide, the main ingredient in acid rain, are down 15.3%
since 1985. Emissions of nitrogen oxides, a component of both acid
rain and smog, are down 1.6% since 1980.
Emissions
of carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds, two other air
pollutants that harm human health and the environment, are also
down.
However,
Canada fares very poorly when our record on air pollution is compared
with other industrialized nations. For sulphur dioxide and carbon
monoxide emissions, Canada ranks 27th out of 28 OECD nations and
26th out of 27 respectively (meaning Canada has the second highest
per capita emissions). For volatile organic compounds, Canada stands
25th out of 26 OECD countries. For nitrogen oxides, Canada ranks
25th out of 28 OECD nations. These facts indicate that despite making
progress, Canada is one of the worst air polluters among industrialized
nations.
Climate
Change
Canada fares very poorly on this important indicator, ranking 27th
out of 29 OECD nations in per capita greenhouse gas emissions. Only
the United States and Luxembourg produce higher per capita levels
of greenhouse gases. Canadians pump out 48% more greenhouse gas
emissions per capita than the OECD average. To make matters worse,
Canadian emissions are up approximately 13.5% since 1990, in violation
of our international commitments to stabilize and reduce emissions,
embodied in the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.
Water
Canadas record on water issues is mixed. Canadians rank a
dismal 28th out of 29 OECD nations in water consumption per capita,
with only Americans consuming more water. The amount of water consumed
in Canada has increased by 25.7% since 1980, causing greater ecological
stress on aquatic ecosystems and raising the costs of maintaining
adequate water infrastructure.
On the
other hand, Canada has made strides in improving municipal sewage
treatment. Canada ranks ninth among the 28 OECD nations as seventy-eight
percent of Canadians are served by public sewage treatment, up from
64% in 1980. However, there are still over 90 Canadian municipalities,
including three provincial capitals (Victoria, Halifax and St. Johns)
that dump their sewage raw and untreated into water bodies.
Energy
Canadas record on energy issues is abysmal. In terms of energy
use per capita, Canadians rank 27th out of 29 OECD nations, ahead
of only Iceland and Luxembourg. In terms of total energy use, Canada
stands 26th out of 29.
With
respect to energy efficiency, meaning the amount of energy required
to produce a fixed amount of GDP, Canada ranks 28th out of 29 OECD
nations. Although Canadas energy efficiency has increased
by 21% since 1980, this gain was more than offset by our increasing
population and economic growth so that total energy consumption
continued to climb, rising 20.3% between 1980 and 1997.
Waste
Canadians produce an average of 490 kilograms of municipal waste
per person annually, which puts Canada 18th out of 27 OECD nations.
This is a 3.9% decrease in garbage per person between 1980 and 1997.
Canadians recycle 33% of paper and cardboard and 17% of glass. These
figures represent significant progress since 1980, but still place
Canada 24th out of 25 OECD nations for glass recycling and 21st
out of 28 countries for paper and cardboard.
Canada
produces more nuclear waste every year, per capita, than any other
OECD nation. In terms of total nuclear waste, only the United States
produces more (although Canada is projected to surpass the U.S.
by 2010). The annual volume of nuclear waste produced in Canada
has grown by 76% since 1982. As well, Canadians are 24th out of
27 nations in per capita hazardous waste.
Ozone
Depleting Substances
Canada has made major progress in reducing the production, consumption
and release of ozone-depleting substances. Production of chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs), the most problematic ozone-depleting substance, has been
completely eliminated in Canada since 1995.
However
Canada still ranks 13th out of 16 OECD nations in terms of per capita
consumption of ozone-depleting substances, largely because of a
76% increase in the production and use of HCFCs, an interim substitute
for CFCs.
Agriculture
Canada has a poor record on environmental issues related
to agriculture. Canada ranks 22nd out of 28 OECD nations on pesticide
use, 25th out of 28 on commercial fertilizer use and 16th out of
28 in terms of livestock (cattle, pigs, sheep and goats). Pesticide
use may be declining1 while commercial fertilizer use increased
by 42% between 1980 and 1997. The number of livestock in Canada
rose, with cattle up 8.5%, pigs up 17.4% and sheep up 30.8% between
1980 and 1998.
Biodiversity
Among OECD nations, Canada ranks 7th out of 29 for the number of
species at risk2, 20th out of 28 in volume of wild fish caught per
capita, 27th out of 29 in volume of timber logged per capita and
13th out of 29 in percentage of land designated as parks, ecological
reserves and other protected areas.
The number
of endangered species on Canadas national list increased from
178 species in 1988 to 364 in 2000. The volume of timber removed
from Canadian forests increased 14.6% between 1980 and 1997. The
volume of fish caught dropped 73% since 1990, reflecting the ecological
disasters in the east coast cod and west coast salmon fisheries.
On the other hand, major strides have been made in Canada in creating
new protected areas. The percentage of land protected has increased
42% since 1983. A troubling caveat is that less than half of the
area protected in Canada meets international standards for strict
protection.
Transportation
Canada is 25th out of 29 OECD nations in motor vehicles per capita
and 26th out of 29 in road distance traveled. Both the number of
motor vehicles in Canada and the road distance traveled have more
than doubled since 1970.
Miscellaneous
Canada places 26th out of 29 OECD nations in population growth because
of a 24.4% increase between 1980 and 1998. Only Turkey, Mexico and
Australia experienced faster population growth. Seventeen OECD nations
have smaller populations than Canada, placing Canada 18th out of
29 countries in terms of total population.
Despite
Canadas international reputation as a generous and compassionate
country, Canada ranks only 11th out of 20 OECD nations in official
development assistance, also known as foreign aid. This is an important
environmental indicator because a significant proportion of foreign
aid is intended to alleviate environmental problems in the developing
world. Canada dedicated 0.29% of its GDP to official development
assistance in 1998, down 33% since 1980.
The Eco-Research
Chair of Environmental Law and Policy at the University of Victoria
is currently undertaking a comprehensive assessment of Canadian
environmental law and policy to determine the reasons behind Canadas
relatively poor environmental record. The Eco-Research Chairs
assessment will be published in 2002.
|